Skip to content
halcroft

Accountancy

Recover the fee-earner capacity lost to recurring work.

Document chasing, onboarding and reporting repeat every cycle and absorb fee-earner time. Halcroft assesses which recurring workflow costs the most, implements a fix where the case is strong, and measures the result.

Typically: Managing partner, operations lead or group leader at an established accountancy practice.

Where the constraint sits

  • Client document chase that runs on fee-earner time
  • Onboarding and deadline visibility that vary between teams
  • Management reporting and handoffs between teams done by hand

Typical workflows

One process at a time.

  • 01

    Client onboarding and document collection

  • 02

    Deadline visibility

  • 03

    Management-report production

  • 04

    Handoffs between teams

Case 02 · Accountancy · UK

A four-person practice serving around 180 clients automated the chase without automating the judgement.

Accountancy workflow results before and after one year-end cycle
MeasureBeforeAfter one cycle
Fee-earner hours chasing24 hrs6 hrs
Clients submitting on time62%88%
Request to document receipt21 days9 days
Clients missing the deadline143
Estimated advisory capacity released*Not tracked£15,500 per cycle

*Estimated, and supplied with the approved case material. Figures are per year-end cycle, of which there is one a year, not per week: 18 fee-earner hours a week freed across the 12-week crunch is 216 hours at £120 an hour, of which roughly 60 per cent was redeployed to chargeable work. The operational measures above were recorded across that same cycle.

What stayed human

Complex and sensitive cases still go to a fee earner. Partners retain sign-off on non-standard work, and clients who need a phone call are surfaced to a person.

Read the full case study

Example systems

What the system handles, and what your people decide.

Compliance Reporting System

Makes recurring regulatory reporting a process the firm runs rather than an event the firm survives.

The system handles

  • Collects evidence against required controls
  • Drafts against the current reporting template
  • Records changes from the prior cycle

People decide

  • How requirements apply to exceptions
  • Whether evidence is sufficient
  • What is approved and filed
See all example systems

How it starts

Assess broadly, build narrowly.

  1. 01

    Introductory call

    45 minutes, free. We look at where capacity is constrained and whether an assessment is worth doing. It is a conversation, not an audit.

  2. 02

    Paid operational AI assessment

    Fixed fee, scoped before it starts. Interviews, process and systems review, a baseline where the data allows, ranked opportunities with the financial assumptions, risks, and what not to automate. The report stands on its own, whether or not Halcroft builds anything.

  3. 03

    Scoped implementation

    Separately proposed and only where the assessment supports it. Agreed problem, acceptance criteria, data and security arrangements, human review points, training, handover, and measurement of the result.

  4. 04

    Ongoing support

    Optional, and only where there is a real recurring responsibility. Separately agreed, with its own fee and service scope. Many engagements end at handover.

A useful first conversation

Discuss the recurring workflow consuming fee-earner time.

On a free introductory call we look at where delivery capacity is going today, and say plainly if an assessment would not be worth paying for.

Book an introductory call